![]() ![]() In short, we would use one person's brain data to produce a specific pattern of neural activity in another individual.īy the time we finally tried out our design, two other teams of neuroscientists had also transmitted signals directly between brains, though not between two humans. ![]() Because neurons communicate electrically, we can strategically influence their messaging by applying electric current or a magnetic field, among other tricks. The signal would dictate how to electrically stimulate the recipient's brain. We would focus on extracting one such pattern and then send it over the Internet to a second person. Hidden in that neural hubbub are signals that indicate what a person is thinking. The gist of our strategy was to use electrodes arranged on one person's scalp to pick up brain waves, a technique known as electroencephalography. Along with other scientists, we are now learning to bypass traditional modes of communication and swap thoughts directly between brains. ![]() In conversations at the University of Washington, where we both work, we realized that we had all the equipment we needed to build a rudimentary version of this technology. Such ideas have been a staple of science fiction, from the Vulcan mind meld of Star Trek to the control of an avatar by a paraplegic human in the movie Avatar. Or perhaps a medical student could learn a complex surgical skill straight from a mentor's mind. Imagine if a teacher could convey a mathematical proof directly to your brain, nonverbally. In 2010 one of us (Rao) had a realization: perhaps we could use this same principle to beam thoughts from one human brain to another. BCIs rely on data-processing techniques to extract a person's intention to move and then relay that information to the device he or she wishes to control. Technologies known as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are now beginning to allow paralyzed individuals to control, say, a computer cursor or a prosthetic limb with their brain signals. Neural engineers have spent several decades developing ways to overcome such impairments. And certain disabilities rob people of their full communicative powers even as their minds remain otherwise intact. Some abstract concepts and emotions can be difficult to convey with words. With that statement he ushered in the telecommunications revolution that would ultimately bring us mobile phones, the Internet, and near-instantaneous exchanges of speech, text and video across continents. Watson, come here!” Alexander Graham Bell uttered these first words over a telephone 138 years ago. Thus, the seemingly innocuous events of “Sarek” in Star Trek: The Next Generation have potentially doomed Star Trek's future.“Mr. If the Borg do exists in the future when Star Trek: Discovery is set, it's likely they'll stop at nothing to assimilate the Discovery's sentient computer and unique spore drive. Control is a bodiless equal to the Borg, and thanks to Sarek, the Borg have had roughly 800 years to prepare to assimilate it - and plan to go after the sphere data as well. Control was Section 31's rogue AI program that posed a significant threat to the future: not only did it take over Lieutenant Commander Airiam, but it proved basically impossible to completely destroy, hence why the USS Discovery fled with the sphere data to the future. With the Borg in possession of Picard’s memories, including the shared memories of Ambassador Sarek, the future of the Federation and Starfleet could in fact be in greater jeopardy than the crew of the USS Discovery realize. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |